Browsing by Author "Dana, Jason"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects(Nature Publishing Groups, 2016) Tierney, Warren; Schweinsberg, Martín; Jordan, Jennifer; Kennedy, Deanna; Qureshi, Israr; Sommer, Amy; Thornley, Nico; Madan, Nikhil; Vianello, Michelangelo; Awtrey, Eli; Zhu, Luke Lei; Diermeier, Daniel; Heinze, Justin; Srinivasan, Malavika; Tannenbaum, David; Bivolaru, Eliza; Dana, Jason; Davis Stober, Clintin; Du Plessis, Christilene; Gronau, Quentin; Hafenbrack, Andrew; Liao, Eko Yi; Ly, Alexander; Marsman, Maarten; Murase, Toshio; Schaerer, Michael; Tworek, Christina; Wagenmakers, Eric Jan; Wong, Lynn; Anderson, Tabitha; Bauman, Christopher; Bedwell, Wendy; Brescoll, Victoria; Canavan, Andrew; Chandler, Jesse; Cheries, Erik; Cheryan, Sapna; Cheung, Felix; Cimpian, Andrei; Clark, Mark; Cordon, Diana; Cushman, Fiery; Ditto, Peter; Amell, Alice; Frick, Sarah; Gamez Djokic, Monica; Grady, Rebecca Hofstein; Graham, Jesse; Gu, Jun; Hahn, Adam; Hanson, Brittany; Hartwich, Nicole; Hein, Kristie; Inbar, Yoel; Jiang, Lily; Kellogg, Tehlyr; Legate, Nicole; Luoma, Timo; Maibeucher, Heidi; Meindl, Peter; Miles, Jennifer; Mislin, Aalexandra; Molden, Daniel; Motyl, Matt; Newman, George; Ngo, Hoai Huong; Packham, Harvey; Ramsay, Scott; Ray, Jennifer; Sackett, Aaron; Sellier, Anne Laure; Sokolova, Tatiana; Sowden, Walter; Storage, Daniel; Sun, Xiaomin; Van Bavel, Jay; Washburn, Anthony; Wei, Cong; Wetter, Erick; Wilson, Carlos; Darroux, Sophie Charlotte; Uhlmann, Eric Luis; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75We present the data from a crowdsourced project seeking to replicate findings in independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. In this Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) initiative,25 research groups attempted to replicate 10 moral judgment effects from a single laboratory's research pipeline of unpublished findings. The 10 effects were investigated using online/lab surveys containing psychological manipulations (vignettes) followed by questionnaires. Results revealed a mix of reliable,unreliable,and culturally moderated findings. Unlike any previous replication project,this dataset includes the data from not only the replications but also from the original studies,creating a unique corpus that researchers can use to better understand reproducibility and irreproducibility in science.Publication Taste-Based Gender Favouritism in High-Stake Decisions: Evidence from the Price is Right(Oxford University Press, 2024) Dana, Jason; Klein Teeselink, Bouke; Atanasov, Pavel; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75Gender discrimination is present across various fields,but identifying the underlying mechanism is challenging. We demonstrate own-gender favouritism in a field setting that allows for clean identification of tastes versus beliefs: the One Bid game on the TV show The Price Is Right. Players must guess an item's value without exceeding it,leaving the last bidder with a dominant 'cutoff' strategy of overbidding another player by $ 1. We show that last bidders are significantly more likely to cut off opposite-gender opponents. This behaviour is explained by own-gender favouritism rather than beliefs that cutting off opposite-gender opponents is more profitable. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Economic Society.Publication The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline(Academic Press Inc., 2016) Tierney, Warren; Schweinsberg, Martín; Jordan, Jennifer; Kennedy, Deanna; Qureshi, Israr; Sommer, Amy; Thornley, Nico; Madan, Nikhil; Vianello, Michelangelo; Awtrey, Eli; Zhu, Luke Lei; Diermeier, Daniel; Heinze, Justin; Srinivasan, Malavika; Tannenbaum, David; Bivolaru, Eliza; Dana, Jason; Davis Stober, Clintin; Du Plessis, Christilene; Gronau, Quentin; Hafenbrack, Andrew; Liao, Eko Yi; Ly, Alexander; Marsman, Maarten; Murase, Toshio; Schaerer, Michael; Tworek, Christina; Wagenmakers, Eric Jan; Wong, Lynn; Anderson, Tabitha; Bauman, Christopher; Bedwell, Wendy; Brescoll, Victoria; Canavan, Andrew; Chandler, Jesse; Cheries, Erik; Cheryan, Sapna; Cheung, Felix; Cimpian, Andrei; Clark, Mark; Cordon, Diana; Cushman, Fiery; Ditto, Peter; Amell, Alice; Frick, Sarah; Gamez Djokic, Monica; Grady, Rebecca Hofstein; Graham, Jesse; Gu, Jun; Hahn, Adam; Hanson, Brittany; Hartwich, Nicole; Hein, Kristie; Inbar, Yoel; Jiang, Lily; Kellogg, Tehlyr; Legate, Nicole; Luoma, Timo; Maibeucher, Heidi; Meindl, Peter; Miles, Jennifer; Mislin, Aalexandra; Molden, Daniel; Motyl, Matt; Newman, George; Ngo, Hoai Huong; Packham, Harvey; Ramsay, Scott; Ray, Jennifer; Sackett, Aaron; Sellier, Anne Laure ; Sokolova, Tatiana; Sowden, Walter; Storage, Daniel; Sun, Xiaomin; Van Bavel, Jay; Washburn, Anthony; Wei, Cong; Wetter, Erick; Wilson, Carlos; Darroux, Sophie Charlotte; Uhlmann, Eric Luis; Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research,in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach,25 research groups conducted replications of all ten moral judgment effects which the last author and his collaborators had “in the pipeline” as of August 2014. Six findings replicated according to all replication criteria,one finding replicated but with a significantly smaller effect size than the original,one finding replicated consistently in the original culture but not outside of it,and two findings failed to find support. In total,40% of the original findings failed at least one major replication criterion. Potential ways to implement and incentivize pre-publication independent replication on a large scale are discussed. © 2015 The Authors