Person:
Castro, Julio de

Profile Picture
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
First Name
Julio de
Last Name
Castro
Affiliation
IE University
School
IE Business School
Department
Entrepreneurship
Identifiers
Name

Filters

2019 - 201912020 - 20231
Reset filters

Settings

Author: Siraz, Sonia ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    La Legitimidad Empresarial Como Un Intangible. Un Análisis En El Contexto De Industrias Controversiales
    (Economía industrial, 2019) Castro, Julio de; Siraz, Sonia; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75
    Una revisión de la literatura permite identificar las dimensiones que afectan la legitimidad socio-política de las “industrias controvertidas”, que son aquellas relacionadas con productos, conceptos o servicios que, por razones de decencia, delicadeza, moralidad, o miedo, causan sensaciones de disgusto, ofensa, o rabia cuando se las menciona o presenta de una manera abierta. Dichas dimensiones se refieren al bienestar animal, bienestar del medio ambiente, bienestar humano, bienestar moral, protección de la herencia cultural y bienestar socio económico. Con esta clasificación y sus ejemplos se pretende un mejor examen de los determinantes de legitimidad en industrias controvertidas, lo que resulta un área de gran interés para la investigación de activos intangibles.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Theorizing the Grey Area between Legitimacy and Illegitimacy
    (Journal of Management, 2023) Siraz, Sonia ; Claes, Björn; Castro, Julio de; Vaara, Eero; Castro, Julio de; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75
    Despite a proliferation of research on legitimacy,the ‘grey area’ that lies between legitimacy and illegitimacy remains undertheorized. Responding to calls for further research,we clarify the construct of legitimacy and extend legitimacy theory by providing a conceptual framework for analyzing the legitimacy-illegitimacy continuum. First,we propose three novel legitimacy states between legitimacy and illegitimacy – conditional legitimacy,unknown legitimacy,and conditional illegitimacy – and elaborate on the distinct qualitative characteristics of the five legitimacy states. Second,we offer a model of the dynamics of legitimacy state change and the (in)stability of the issue-specific reference framework that is used to judge them. Third,we explain how our legitimacy states bridge the research streams on legitimacy judgment formation and legitimation strategies. By doing so,we integrate these research streams and enumerate discursive strategies for each state. Our article contributes to a more robust understanding of both how legitimacy states can be conceptualized and analyzed in future research and how they can be dealt with in managerial practice. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Management Studies published by Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.