English
Español
Log In
Email address
Password
Log in
or
IE ACCOUNT Log in
New user? Click here to register.
Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
Explore repository
Statistics
English
Español
Log In
Email address
Password
Log in
or
IE ACCOUNT Log in
New user? Click here to register.
Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Authors
Authors
Toral, Guillermo
Person:
Toral, Guillermo
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
First Name
Guillermo
Last Name
Toral
Affiliation
IE University
School
IE School of Politics, Economics & Global Affairs
Department
Comparative Politics
Identifiers
Name
Full item page
1 results
Back to results
Show as list
Show as grid
Filters
Author
Brierley, Sarah
1
Lowande, Kenneth
1
Potter, Rachel Augustine
1
Toral, Guillermo
Search author name
Submit
Date
Start
End
Submit
2023
1
Has files
1
Yes
Item Type
1
Publication
Search item type
Submit
Reset filters
Settings
Sort By
Most Relevant
Title Ascending
Date Issued Descending
Accessioned Date Descending
Results per page
1
5
10
20
40
60
80
100
All of DSpace
Search
Author: Brierley, Sarah
×
Start date: 2019
×
Show as list
Show as grid
Search Tools
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Publication
Bureaucratic Politics: Blind Spots and Opportunities in Political Science
(
Annual Reviews Inc.
,
2023
)
Brierley, Sarah
;
Lowande, Kenneth
;
Potter, Rachel Augustine
;
Toral, Guillermo
;
https://ror.org/02jjdwm75
Show more
Bureaucracy is everywhere. Unelected bureaucrats are a key link between government and citizens,between policy and implementation. Bureaucratic politics constitutes a growing share of research in political science. But the way bureaucracy is studied varies widely,permitting theoretical and empirical blind spots as well as opportunities for innovation. Scholars of American politics tend to focus on bureaucratic policy making at the national level,while comparativists often home in on local implementation by street-level bureaucrats. Data availability and professional incentives have reinforced these subfield-specific blind spots over time.We highlight these divides in three prominent research areas: the selection and retention of bureaucratic personnel,oversight of bureaucratic activities,and opportunities for influence by actors external to the bureaucracy. Our survey reveals how scholars from the American and comparative politics traditions can learn from one another. Copyright © 2023 by the author(s).
Show more