Person: Gómez, Alicia Fátima
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
First Name
Alicia Fátima
Last Name
Gómez
Affiliation
IE Foundation
School
Department
Identifiers
Name
5 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Publication El papel de las bibliotecas en la evaluación de la investigación. Indicadores bibliométricos y altmétricos(Colegio Oficial de Médicos de Madrid, 2015-01-02) Escudero Gómez, Cristina; Estrada Lorenzo, José Manuel; García Romero, Antonio; Gómez, Alicia Fátima; https://ror.org/00c5kmy11English abstract Bibliometrics has become an important part of in our libraries. In addition, social networks and new forms of communication have brought us another way to measure and evaluate the knowledge, publications, communication and science: altmetrics. Therefore, it is good time to reflect on the use, requirements, applications, advantages, challenges, opportunities and the future of bibliometrics in the libraries of health sciences. This document is the result of comments, opinions and ideas expressed by the participants of the Working Group "The role of libraries in the evaluation of research. Altmetrics and bibliometric indicators”, meeting on May 23 in Madrid, at the headquarters of the College of Physicians of Madrid, on the XV Conference on Information and Documentation in Health Sciences (Bibliosalud 2014), under the address of the working group, Antonio Garcia Romero, the IE University and member of the ENID (European Network of Designers Indicator). Spanish abstract La bibliometría se ha convertido en un instrumento más en nuestras bibliotecas, añadiendo a la situación tradicional el hecho de que las redes sociales y las nuevas formas de comunicación nos han acercado otra forma de medir y evaluar el conocimiento, las publicaciones, la comunicación y la ciencia: las altmetrics. Por todo ello, es buen momento para reflexionar sobre el uso, las necesidades, las aplicaciones, las ventajas, los retos, las oportunidades y el futuro de la bibliometría en las bibliotecas de ciencias de la salud. Este documento es el resultado de los comentarios, opiniones y reflexiones vertidas por los participantes del Grupo de Trabajo «El papel de las bibliotecas en la evaluación de la investigación. Indicadores bibliométricos y altmétricos», reunidos el 23 de mayo en Madrid, en la sede del Colegio de Médicos de Madrid, con ocasión de las XV Jornadas de Información y Documentación en Ciencias de la Salud (Bibliosalud 2014), bajo la dirección del responsable del grupo de trabajo, Antonio Garcia Romero, de la IE University y miembro de la ENID (European Network of Indicator Designers).Publication AI Policies in Academic Publishing: New Approaches to Transparency, Ethics, and Accountability(2025-01-21) Gómez, Alicia Fátima; Güneş, Güssün; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to influence academic publishing, its integration has introduced both innovative advancements and complex ethical challenges. This paper explores AI policies implemented by major academic publishers, including Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, and others, aiming to understand how these policies guide ethical AI use and maintain research integrity. The central research question driving this analysis is: In what ways do AI policies shape transparency, ethical responsibility, and accountability in the context of academic publishing? Methodology: To answer this question, we conducted a comparative policy analysis, examining documents and guidelines provided by key academic publishers. Policies were analyzed to assess criteria such as transparency, author accountability, ethical standards, confidentiality, and intellectual property considerations. Each policy was evaluated for directives on AI use across three primary areas: authorship, manuscript preparation, and peer review processes. By mapping out common principles and unique variations, this analysis identifies emerging trends in how publishers navigate AI's evolving role within academic publishing. Results: Our findings reveal a shared emphasis on transparency and author responsibility. Across all policies, publishers mandate that authors disclose any AI usage in their manuscript preparation, typically within the Methods or Acknowledgments sections. This requirement supports transparency and allows reviewers to better understand the scope of AI assistance. Furthermore, policies consistently prohibit AI from being listed as an author, underscoring the idea that AI lacks the original thought and accountability that human authors provide. Confidentiality emerges as another core tenet, with most publishers discouraging the use of AI in peer review, as uploading manuscripts to AI platforms could compromise privacy and data security. Ethical considerations further extend to AI-generated visuals and data manipulation, with restrictions placed on using AI to fabricate, alter, or misrepresent images or datasets. Significance: The implications of these findings are significant in promoting ethical standards and preventing potential misuse of AI in academic research. As the AI landscape evolves, these policies represent essential guidelines, positioning publishers as gatekeepers of research integrity. They advocate for transparency in AI disclosures and underscore the need for human accountability, both crucial for maintaining trust in the scholarly record. In establishing clear boundaries for AI's role, these policies also anticipate future technological advancements, promoting adaptability and vigilance among authors, reviewers, and editors. This study contributes to the broader discourse on AI governance by illustrating how academic publishers are actively shaping the ethical framework around AI in research. It serves as a valuable resource for researchers, institutions, and policymakers interested in fostering an ethical integration of AI in academia. In sum, by enforcing transparency, prioritizing accountability, and addressing ethical risks, these policies not only protect the credibility of academic research but also support a responsible transition to AI-enhanced scholarly communication.Publication Embracing Open Science: Meeting requirements and unlocking benefits(IE University, 2024-10-30) Gómez, Alicia Fátima; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75-Publication FAIR in Practice: evaluación de los principios FAIR para datasets de Investigación(2025-02-26) Gómez, Alicia Fátima; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75This content explores the practical implementation of FAIR principles—ensuring research data is findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. It outlines different levels of FAIR maturity and highlights the importance of metadata quality, licensing, and repository standards. A range of tools and platforms are presented to help researchers assess and improve the FAIRness of their datasets, including automated evaluation services and self-assessment resources. It also includes templates and guidelines for describing research data to facilitate better sharing and reuse across scientific communities.Publication Meet & Greet: (Open) Science and Research Data Management(IE University, 2025-03-25) Gómez, Alicia Fátima; Aguilera Ortega, Raúl; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75This presentation introduces key concepts, policies, and actors involved in Open Science and Research Data Management across Europe and Spain. It explores how international recommendations, national strategies, and EU frameworks like Horizon Europe and ResearchComp are shaping a more open, transparent, and responsible research ecosystem. The content also addresses FAIR data principles, privacy and intellectual property rights, and the evolving role of libraries in supporting infrastructures and services. Emphasis is placed on skills development, research assessment reform, and enabling practices such as open access, data sharing, and responsible data governance.