Publication: Reducing Unequal Representation: The Impact of Labor Unions on Legislative Responsiveness in the U.S. Congress
Date
2020-07-21
Authors
Stegmueller, Daniel
Advisor
Court
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Defense Date
Metrics
Citation
Abstract
It has long been recognized that economic inequality may undermine the principle of equal responsiveness that lies at the core of democratic governance. A recent wave of scholarship has highlighted an acute degree of political inequality in contemporary democracies in North America and Europe. In contrast to the view that unequal responsiveness in favor of the affluent is nearly inevitable when income inequality is high, we argue that organized labor can be an effective source of political equality. Focusing on the paradigmatic case of the U.S. House of Representatives, our novel dataset combines income-specific estimates of constituency preferences based on 223,000 survey respondents matched to roll-call votes with a measure of district-level union strength drawn from administrative records. We find that local unions significantly dampen unequal responsiveness to high incomes: a standard deviation increase in union membership increases legislative responsiveness towards the poor by about six to eight percentage points. As a result, in districts with relatively strong unions legislators are about equally responsive to rich and poor Americans. We rule out alternative explanations using flexible controls for policies, institutions, and economic structure, as well as a novel instrumental variable for unionization based on history and geography. We also show that the impact of unions operates via campaign contributions and partisan selection.
Unesco subjects
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
School
IE School of Politics, Economics & Global Affairs
Center
Keywords
Citation
Becher, M., & Stegmueller, D. (2021). Reducing unequal representation: the impact of labor unions on legislative responsiveness in the US Congress. Perspectives on Politics, 19(1), 92-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759272000208X