Books & Book chapters
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Books & Book chapters by Author "Aksenova, Marina"
Now showing 1 - 11 of 11
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Arms Trade and Weapons Export Control: The Case of the European Arms Supplies to the Saudi/UAE-led coalition in the Context of the War in Yemen(Taylor & Francis, 2021) Aksenova, Marina; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75International arms sales are a thriving business giving rise to a host of legal concerns for both the supplying and the recipient countries. How much due diligence is a ‘sending’ state required to engage in before weapons are sold? Does state authorization effectively obviate the existence of fault in corporate officials supplying arms later to be used in the commission of war crimes? Finally, to what extent will the new Arms Trade Treaty change state practice? This contribution briefly examines some of the above-mentioned concerns with reference to the recent submission by the European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) to the International Criminal Court in which the ECCHR advocates for the opening of preliminary examinations into the conduct of several European companies supplying arms to the Saudi/UAE-led coalition in the context of the war in Yemen.Publication Conclusion: Universality, dignity, and the five great elements(Edward Elgard, 2023-05-18) Aksenova, Marina; Gantheret, Fiana; Guibert, Nolwenn; Stolk, Sofia; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75The concluding chapter builds bridges between the notions of art and aesthetics, human rights, universality, and dignity. The fields of aesthetics and human rights strive towards universality that transcends identities. Our ability to appreciate beauty is universal even if individual tastes differ with respect to the specific artistic object. Human rights discourse embraces universality in the form of human dignity - an irreducible core uniting all people and rendering them worthy of rights and duties simply by virtue of existing. The second part of the chapter draws on Indian philosophy in exploring the idea of universality through the five great elements - earth, water, fire, air, and space. Each element corresponds to a set of principles governing all of life, including solidity, fluidity, and transformation. Each chapter in this volume is then brought under this classification based on intuitive insight.Publication Introduction: Breaking the Cycle of Mass Atrocities: Criminological and Socio-Legal Approaches to International Criminal Law.(Bloomsbury, 2020-12-17) Aksenova, Marina; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75It is evident from the on-going debates on whether state policy is an element of crimes against humanity that this category of core international crimes still struggles with establishing its own identity. Originally conceived at Nuremberg as an extension of war crimes, it grew into an independent and ambitious legal category, which seeks to address gross human rights abuses committed on a massive scale in peace- and wartime alike. At the same time, this group of offences breeds a lot of ambiguity because of its over reliance on customary international law. With all the fluidity engendered by the weak legal foundation, where to find justification for international prosecution of crimes against humanity? This paper invokes criminologically related work of Emile Durkheim to support the claim that moral legitimacy of crimes against humanity as a group of offences flows from the feelings collectively shared by individuals across state borders. Repulsion towards certain acts is ingrained in the consciousness of people worldwide.Publication Non-Criminal Justice Fact-Work in the Age of Accountability(Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher (TOAEP), 2020-07-27) Aksenova, Marina; Bergsmo, Morten; Stahn, Carsten; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75-Publication Substantive Law Issues in the Tokyo Judgment: From Facts to Law?(Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher (TOAEP), 2020-10-27) Aksenova, Marina; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75-Publication Symbolic Expression at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia(Oxford Academic, 2020-06-11) Aksenova, Marina; Stahn, Carsten; Agius, Carmel; Brammertz, Serge; Rohan, Colleen; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75The chapter argues that, at the creation of International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), conditions were ripe for establishing this kind of forum. The ICTY was instituted with one overarching aim: condemnation of evil deemed universal. The language of the UN Security Council resolutions demonstrates an intensifying concern over offences committed in the Balkan war. The overarching purpose of the tribunal was symbolic—to uphold the value of human dignity through the ritual of criminal prosecutions in the light of the inability of local actors to prevent further escalation of atrocities. The chapter relies on two theoretical frameworks to support its claim: the theory of discourse analysis developed by Michel Foucault, projecting the ICTY’s power outwards focusing on the content of its input, and an anthropological exploration of the symbolic nature of rituals by Maurice Bloch, identifying the structure within which this content is generated.Publication The Emerging Right to Justice in International Criminal Law: A Case Study of Colombia(Cambridge University Press, 2019-06) Aksenova, Marina; Scheinin, Martin; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75This chapter uses the case study of Colombia to argue that there is an emerging right to justice born out of the aspirations of international criminal law. This right comprises several elements, each finding its own unique realisation in the context of Colombia’s transition to peace. More specifically, the chapter discusses the right to see perpetrators of mass atrocities held accountable, the right to peace and reconciliation, the right not to face repetition of collective violence, victims’ right to justice, the right to truth, and, finally, the right to local administration of justice. The International Criminal Court (ICC) plays a role in enforcing these various elements of the overarching right to justice but with clear limitations dictated by the nature of international criminal law as a discipline relying on State cooperation and its own moral appeal. Such process is best understood if one sees the ICC as the enforcer at the domestic level of the generic right to justice.Publication The Future of the International Criminal Court: A Non-human Rights Body?(Cambridge University Press, 2018-10-11) Aksenova, Marina; De Hert, Paul; Smis, Stefaan; Holvoet, Mathias; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75Discussion about the interaction between human rights law (HRL) and international criminal law (ICL) is gaining momentum in scholarly circles. This is not unexpected. Human rights issues are continuously lurking in the background of international criminal trials. It is difficult to imagine international criminal justice without its HRL component – legal guarantees afforded to different parties in the process as well as principles underlying substantive offences in international law. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) expressly requires that the legal sources used by the Court must be interpreted consistently with internationally recognised human rights standards. The relevance of HRL for international criminal trials seems to be implicitly acknowledged, but is rarely studied or analysed systematically. However, can one equate the ICC to a human rights body? To what extent does its mission converge with the mandate of its regional human rights counterparts – the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Inter- American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) – in upholding and reinforcing human rights? Vasiliev has argued that there exists a strong normative pull to ensure the tribunals’ (and presumably the ICC's) conformity with HRL. It results in an informal hierarchy, in which deference to human rights courts is seen as an aspect of good judging. This tendency stems from a concern shared by both sets of courts to protect human rights from abuses as well as to ensure fair administration of criminal justice. Informal supremacy of human rights case law – or ‘the asymmetry of influence’ – is the result of the uneven mutual substantive relevance of the two disciplines reinforced by the expectation that the ad hoc tribunals would treat human rights jurisprudence with deference – a belief internalised by international judges. Vasiliev has acknowledged the links between ICL and IHRL, but has argued against the normative rhetoric of ‘cross-fertilisation’ – widely accepted in scholarly circles – as it misconstrues the tribunals’ engagement with the regional human rights courts and is incapable of enhancing human rights compliance by the ad hoc tribunals. This chapter continues this line of discourse by invoking an empirical example evidencing the limitations that the ICC faces when incorporating human rights norms in its judicial reasoning.Publication The ICC Involvement in Colombia: Walking the Fine Line Between Peace and Justice(Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher (TOAEP), 2018-09-06) Aksenova, Marina; Bergsmo, Morten; Stahn, Carsten; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75-Publication The Role of Aesthetics in Furthering Integrity(Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2020-11-19) Aksenova, Marina; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75-Publication Transformative Power of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia(Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher (TOAEP), 2020-12-09) Aksenova, Marina; https://ror.org/02jjdwm75-