Publication:
What is the quack about? Legitimation strategies and their perceived appropriateness in the foie gras industry

dc.contributor.authorClaes, Björn
dc.contributor.authorSiraz, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Julio de
dc.contributor.authorLapeyre, Eléanor Maéva
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Julio de
dc.contributor.rorhttps://ror.org/02jjdwm75
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T13:14:11Z
dc.date.available2024-07-08T13:14:11Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study contributes to the legitimacy literature by investigating the perceived appropriateness of legitimation strategies used by controversial organizations. Through a mixed-method approach comprising interviews and conjoint experiments,we shed light on how evaluators perceive the appropriateness of five legitimation strategies used by the foie gras industry in France and how evaluators' environmentalism and media skepticism influence their perceptions. Some strategies favored by the industry are perceived as inappropriate by evaluators and thus may obstruct or,worse,counter the intended goal of legitimacy enhancement. Moreover,we observe that evaluators' high environmentalism and high media skepticism affect the perceived appropriateness of the strategies,albeit not of all five. Evaluators with high media skepticism favor explanation discourses and strategies that establish a common identity of the industry. Evaluators with high environmentalism favor the use of recognizable quality standards and labels,yet they are wary of high levels of organization through structured representation of industry interests. © 2024 The Authors. European Management Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Management (EURAM).
dc.description.keywordConjoint experiments
dc.description.keywordControversial organizations
dc.description.keywordFoie gras
dc.description.keywordLegitimacy perceptions
dc.description.keywordLegitimation strategies
dc.description.keywordMixed-methods
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationClaes, B., Siraz, S.S., de Castro, J. & Lapeyre, E.M. (2024) What is the quack about? Legitimation strategies and their perceived appropriateness in the foie gras industry. European Management Review, 1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12634
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12634
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85182473002&doi=10.1111%2femre.12634&partnerID=40&md5=1878503945e5f23647ca73e8ceff3896
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/3009
dc.journal.titleEuropean Management Review
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.total0
dc.relation.departmentEntrepreneurship
dc.relation.entityIE University
dc.relation.schoolIE Business School
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectconjoint experiments; controversial organizations; foie gras; legitimacy perceptions; legitimation strategies; mixed-methods
dc.subject.keywordConjoint experiments
dc.subject.keywordControversial organizations
dc.subject.keywordFoie gras
dc.subject.keywordLegitimacy perceptions
dc.subject.keywordLegitimation strategies
dc.subject.keywordMixed-methods
dc.titleWhat is the quack about? Legitimation strategies and their perceived appropriateness in the foie gras industry
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.version.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.scopus-author-id36616976300
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57201900816
person.identifier.scopus-author-id15729464100
person.identifier.scopus-author-id58814360800
relation.isAuthorOfPublication280c54e4-8cc0-476c-b910-ab9061db5f47
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery280c54e4-8cc0-476c-b910-ab9061db5f47
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
What is the quack about Legitimation strategies and their perceived appropriateness in the foie gras industry.pdf
Size:
684.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format