Publication:
When entrepreneurial rhetoric meets strict regulations: Implications for the valuation of health science firms

dc.contributor.authorWang, Taiyuan
dc.contributor.authorMalik, Sumeet
dc.contributor.authorWales, William
dc.contributor.rorhttps://ror.org/02jjdwm75
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T13:14:20Z
dc.date.available2024-07-08T13:14:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractResearch Summary: Health science firms have long product development horizons and need regulatory approval for market entry. In communicating with investors,they may use entrepreneurial orientation (EO) rhetoric to emphasize their strategic and behavioral commitment to product innovation and market entry. However,because EO rhetoric constitutes a soft-information signal rather than evidence of substantive commitment,investors may suspect firm insiders using such rhetoric of impression management. The solution,we argue,is EO rhetoric sustained over time,which produces more reliable information for investors—in contrast to occasional increases in EO rhetoric,which invite skeptical scrutiny. Nevertheless,investors' potential concerns regarding changes in EO rhetoric can be mitigated by concurrent hard-information signals that carry signaling costs or penalty costs for false signaling. Managerial Summary: Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) rhetoric can reduce information asymmetry between managers and investors. In strictly regulated contexts such as health science industries,using such rhetoric may be challenging. For firms embracing entrepreneurial strategies and behaviors,maintaining EO rhetoric over time is critical to overcoming skepticism that it is merely “cheap talk.” For investors,this study also suggests that health science firms maintaining higher EO rhetoric over time deserve higher valuations,given the variety of benefits an EO can have for health science firms. If a health science firm aims to ramp up its EO rhetoric,managers should be aware that investors may interpret the increase as impression management and should confront this interpretation head-on—for instance,by simultaneously increasing entry commitment or corporate social responsibility. © 2021 The Authors. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal published by John Wiley & Sons,Ltd. on behalf of Strategic Management Society.
dc.description.peerreviewedyes
dc.description.statusPublished
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationWang, T., Malik, S., & Wales, W. J. (2021). When entrepreneurial rhetoric meets strict regulations: Implications for the valuation of health science firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1396.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1396
dc.identifier.issn1932-4391
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85102368688&doi=10.1002%2fsej.1396&partnerID=40&md5=5e261c401a3ce6bf007cae991d6b4449
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/3063
dc.issue.number2
dc.journal.titleStrategic Entrepreneurship Journal
dc.language.isoen
dc.page.final230
dc.page.initial209
dc.page.total11
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.entityIE University
dc.relation.schoolIE Business School
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordCorporate social responsibility
dc.subject.keywordEntrepreneurial rhetoric
dc.subject.keywordEntry commitment
dc.subject.keywordHealth science firms
dc.subject.keywordStrict regulations
dc.titleWhen entrepreneurial rhetoric meets strict regulations: Implications for the valuation of health science firms
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.version.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.volume.number15
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55193717500
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57203868326
person.identifier.scopus-author-id37065384200
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
When entrepreneurial rhetoric meets strict regulations Implications for the valuation of health science firms.pdf
Size:
2.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format